Friday, May 6, 2011

One in three Africans is now middle class

Global development news, comment and analysis | guardian.co.uk

Findings challenge view of continent as a place of famine and poverty

One in three Africans is middle class, a rising group of consumers to rival those of China and India, researchers have found.

Record numbers of people in Africa own houses and cars, use mobile phones and the internet and send their children to private schools and foreign universities, according to the African Development Bank.

Mthuli Ncube, the bank's chief economist, said the findings should challenge long-held perceptions of Africa as a continent of famine, poverty and hopelessness.

"Hey you know what, the world please wake up, this is a phenomenon in Africa that we've not spent a lot of time thinking about," Ncube said. "There is a middle class that is driven by specific factors such as education and we should change our view and work with this group to create a new Africa and make sure Africa realises its full potential."

Ncube said the study used an absolute definition of middle class, meaning people who spend between $2 and $20 a day, which he believed was appropriate given the cost of living for Africa's nearly 1 billion people.

The study found that, by last year, Africa's middle class had risen to about 34% of the continent's population, or about 313m people – up from around 111m (26%) in 1980 and 196m (27%) in 2000.

The growth rate of the middle class over the past 30 years was about 3.1%, slightly faster than that of the total population. Tunisia, Morocco and Egypt had proportionately the biggest middle classes in Africa, while Liberia, Burundi and Rwanda had the smallest.

The Africa middle classes are more likely to have salaried jobs or own small businesses. They tend not to rely entirely on public health services, seeking more expensive medical care. The middle classes tend to have fewer children and spend more on their nutrition and schooling.

Sales of fridges, TVs and mobile phones have surged in virtually every African country in recent years, the report said. Possession of cars and motorcycles in Ghana, for example, has gone up by 81% in the past five years.

"They own houses and they account for the bulk of housing ownership," Ncube said. "They own cars – people are driving cars in Lagos, in Kampala, in Harare, in Ouagadougou – it's the same middle class. You can even see it in the consumption of petrol. The bulk of them are consuming ICT services and mobile telephony, although the poor are also consumers of mobile telephone services.. They would also send their children to school, preferably private schools, but also schools outside the continent. The same class is sending their children to universities outside their home country, in South Africa, in Australia, in Canada, naturally Europe – France is a bigger absorber from the French-speaking countries – and the US."

The middle class was responsible for at least half of Africa's GDP of $1.6tn, he added. The trend reflected years of sustained economic growth, with sub-Saharan Africa projected at 5.5% this year.

"This has implications," Ncube said. "How should the rest of the world engage with Africa, given this middle class? I think it means that those who want to invest should take the opportunity and look for partners within Africa to invest jointly with."

The focus of aid and development assistance would also have to change in the next 10 to 15 years, he argued. "It will have to concentrate less on the bottom of the pyramid and move to the middle, which means it has to be supportive of private sector initiatives, which then are the way middle class people conduct their lives."

Africa has a relatively young population and has seen millions migrate from rural areas to cities, where shopping malls with designer labels and smart coffee shops are springing up across the continent. Ncube acknowledged that a widening, internet-literate middle class could pose a threat to autocratic leaders, as seen in Egypt and Tunisia.

"The middle class is a source of democracy in Africa in a sense that they are custodians of democracy. They are the people who are educated, they know how to vote, they know what they want, they've got interests to protect. Supporting this class in a way also helps institution building in Africa.

But the research found that poverty remains deeply entrenched, with 61% of Africa's population living on less than $2 a day. An estimated 21% earn only enough to spend $2 to $4 a day, leaving about 180 million people vulnerable to economic shocks that could knock them out of the new middle class.

At the top of the pyramid, an elite of about 100,000 Africans had a collective net worth of 60% of the continent's gross domestic product in 2008, the report said.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Sent with Reeder


 

Thursday, May 5, 2011

Everything Old Is New Again, and Nonprofits Should Stay That Way

SSIR Opinion & Analysis

A couple of weeks ago, I received a press release about the new Palindrome Advisors group with the subject line, "Redefining the Nonprofit Model." Doubtless, you're all familiar with the genre: A group of business people get together and decide that the nonprofit sector hasn't cured cancer or ended poverty because people in the nonprofit sector are inadequate, and that an infusion of good old hard-headed American for-profit business practices will compensate for that. Voilà: instant Great Society!

This particular redefinition is truly revolutionary:

One hundred advisers, including many of Silicon Valley's elite, are coming together to disrupt the nonprofit space….[They] have committed to one full year of serving on the board of a nonprofit….[and] attending monthly salons where they will discuss the specific pain points of their assigned nonprofits and attempt to find solutions as a team….[This] is part of a larger movement . . . to make the nonprofit world more efficient….[Founder Zaw Thet states,] "This is just the start of how [we] will disrupt the nonprofit sector and create new, innovative ways for business leaders to contribute….Before [this], there was no easy path for nonprofits to find experienced leaders to help them at a board management level. A board role is not just about fundraising, but includes developing growth plans, operational efficiency, cause marketing, customer relationship management, event planning, and much more."…In order to maximize results, [the group] carefully matches advisors to nonprofits based on their skills, interests and a nonprofit's needs.

So let's review: A bunch of business people are going to sit on nonprofit boards of directors! And then periodically those business people will get together and talk about how to be better board members!  As board members, they will not only fundraise, but also contribute their skills! They'll join boards based on their interest in the nonprofit's mission! And they'll seek ways to improve the whole sector!

The accumulation of these radical notions caused me to swoon, but the one idea that really had me down for the count was that the entire purpose of the endeavor was to "disrupt the nonprofit space." Do nonprofits that are trying to serve their clients really need disruption in their management to supplement the disruption of funding they constantly face, the disruption of their staff produced by those funding crises, and the disruption of their ability to operate smoothly or to secure resources when their message is being drowned out by a constant drumbeat of demands for "reinvention"?

As I fanned myself back to consciousness, I was struck once more. This time the weapon was yet another article about hybrid corporate forms designed to enable nonprofits to earn their own revenue and stop "begging." Whether the discussion purports to be about Low Profit Limited Liability Corporations (L3Cs) or public benefit corporations or triple bottom lines, the argument is always the same: Nonprofits should just get with the capitalist program, identify lucrative markets, and earn their keep like every other good red-blooded American.

This approach ignores the fact that nonprofit markets usually consist of clients who are not profitable to serve—because if they were profitable to serve, the for-profit sector would be serving them. The better a nonprofit is at finding and serving its market, the poorer it will be, because though for-profit clients are a profit center, nonprofit clients are a cost center.

These two news items have one thing in common: They ignore the fact that what nonprofits need isn't more advice, it's more money. When business people are ready to provide that—when they're ready to serve on boards, not as agents of disruption but as securers of resources, and when they're ready to advocate for a tax system that will underwrite the necessary work done by the voluntary sector—well, that will be news.


image
Kelly Kleiman, who blogs as The Nonprofiteer, is principal of NFP Consulting, which provides strategic planning, Board development and fundraising advice to charities and philanthropies. She is also a lawyer and freelance journalist whose reportage and essays about social justice, the arts, and woman's issues have appeared in the Chicago pages of the New York Times as well as in the Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, Christian Science Monitor and other dailies; in magazines including In These Times and Chicago Philanthropy; in the Alternative Press; on Chicago Public Radio and the BBC; and on websites including The Huffington Post.

Sent with Reeder


 

L.I.F.E. Lessons (A Short Guide to Ethics)

The Business Ethics Blog

In this blog, I spend a lot of time talking about particular ethical issues in the world of commerce. "What are the limits on honesty in business?" "How should we handle conflicts of interest?" And so on. But one of the questions I get asked most frequently, as a professor and as a consultant, is about how to go about making ethical decisions, quite generally. It's not an easy question. There have been many, many attempts to sum up our ethical obligations, none of them fully satisfactory. Naturally, you're never going to find a brief summary — let alone a slogan or single word — that captures everything about how we ought to think about complex issues involving a range of values, virtues, and principles. But it can be useful to think in terms of a brief acronym that serves to jog the memory, to remind us of the major elements that make up our ethical responsibilities.

One way to think of ethics is in terms of what I call "L.I.F.E. Lessons." Each of the letters in "L.I.F.E." stands for a word that should play a crucial role in our moral reasoning:

L is for Loyalty. The "L" in "L.I.F.E." reminds us that loyalty is in many ways the first virtue of organizational life. Loyalty, of course, should never be absolute: being loyal to your company or to your friends doesn't imply that your company or your friends can do no wrong. Loyalty doesn't mean being morally agnostic or refusing to take action when you see wrong being done. The focus on loyalty here is just to remind us that in various roles — as employee, as trustee, as leader — you have been entrusted by others to do your job and to do it right. When we voluntarily associate ourselves with particular people and organizations, the default setting is that they deserve our loyalty.

I is for Integrity. The "I" in "L.I.F.E." reminds us that each of us should aim at integrity. Each of us is responsible for our own actions, and those actions should add up to a clear and consistent pattern of honest and trustworthy behaviour.

F is for Fairness. The "F" in "L.I.F.E." reminds us of the importance of treating each other fairly. We should treat like cases alike, and give people what they are owed. Fairness is a value that has to do with the fact that we want not just to do good in the world, but to make sure that that good is distributed justly — whatever justice demands in particular cases.

E is for Empathy. Finally, the "E" in "L.I.F.E." reminds us of the importance of figuring out how other people feel, in ethically-contentious situations, and what their point of view is. We need empathy in order a) to understand the impact that our actions really have on others, as well as b) to understand other people's reasons, when our ethical judgment differs from theirs.

Again, there's nothing magical about this way of thinking about ethics. It's just a mnemonic, a kind of memory-jogger. Acting appropriately requires much more than this, especially on complex organizational contexts involving special role-specific obligations.

But still, I think the idea of "L.I.F.E. Lessons" amounts to a pretty good heuristic. We all know that loyalty, integrity, fairness, and empathy are crucial ingredients to leading an ethically-sound life, but it's good to be reminded. And if life hasn't taught you these lessons yet, those around you can only hope that it eventually will.


Sent with Reeder


 

Ontwikkelingssamenwerking vergeet gehandicapten

Vice Versa - vakblad over ontwikkelingssamenwerking

In ontwikkelingslanden leven 260 miljoen gehandicapten vaak in grote armoede. Zij worden uitgesloten van onderwijs en gezondheidszorg en nemen geen deel aan de samenleving. Recent werden enkele initiatieven gestart om hierin verbetering te brengen. Helaas worden ze doorkruist door de Nederlandse bezuinigingen op ontwikkelingssamenwerking.

'Ziko Kasonga uit Malawi raakte op zijn veertiende verlamd aan zijn benen. Zij moeder dacht dat hij behekst was en nam hem mee naar een traditionele genezer. Het baatte niet. Ziko kreeg nooit medische hulp en ging niet naar school. Zijn benen raakten ernstig vergroeid. Vandaag slijt hij zijn dagen bedelend in een winkelstraat. Hij ziet geen andere manier om aan geld te komen.'

 

Meedoen

Het is één van de schrijnende voorbeelden uit de campagne ´Meedoen´ van het Liliane Fonds, een hulporganisatie voor kinderen met een handicap. Het Liliane Fonds organiseerde over dit thema workshops en een debat voor de particuliere, kleinere Nederlandse ontwikkelingsorganisaties in samenwerking met het Wereldpodium, een platform voor mensen die geïnteresseerd zijn in ontwikkelingssamenwerking. De campagne richt zich op het betrekken van gehandicapten in ontwikkelingsprojecten. Het recente besluit van staatssecretaris Ben Knapen om te bezuinigen op gezondheidszorg in ontwikkelingslanden, wierp helaas een schaduw over de campagne. De situatie voor gehandicapten zal door de bezuinigingen eerder verslechteren dan verbeteren.

 

Kees van den Broek, directeur van het Liliane Fonds laat zich hierdoor niet uit het veld slaan.

In zijn kantoor in hartje Den Bosch vertelt hij gedreven over het lot van kinderen met een handicap in ontwikkelingslanden. ´Ze voldoen niet aan de geldende norm en dus worden ze buitengesloten. Ze gaan niet naar school en krijgen geen medische zorg. De familie weet vaak niet wat er aan de hand is, denkt dat het kind een besmettelijke ziekte heeft. Een schande en een last voor de familie. Kinderen worden verkocht of worden het slachtoffer van charlatans. Hier moet verandering in komen. Het gaat om een fors deel van de wereldbevolking. We hebben het over 260 miljoen mensen met een handicap waarvan velen beneden de armoedegrens leven in ontwikkelingslanden.'

 

Vicieuze cirkel

Armoede en handicap hangen samen. Beperkingen leiden tot armoede en armoede leidt tot beperkingen. Het is een vicieuze cirkel. Kinderen met een handicap worden buitengesloten, gaan zelden naar school en kunnen daarom als ze volwassen zijn vaak geen eigen inkomen verdienen. Cijfers van de Verenigde Naties geven aan dat circa twintig procent van de handicaps wordt veroorzaakt door ondervoeding en tien procent door infectieziekten. Zo kan een tekort aan vitamine A leiden tot blindheid, zorgt polio voor verlamming en ontstaat invaliditeit door lepra. Uitsluiting dwingt mensen met een handicap hun inkomen op onveilige en onzekere manieren te verdienen. De trieste situatie van Ziko Kasonga staat helaas niet op zichzelf. Het Liliane Fonds vroeg er daarom aandacht voor in de campagne 'Meedoen'.

Leerprogramma

De campagne ' Meedoen' is niet het enige recente initiatief op dit gebied. Paulien Bruijn, cultureel antropoloog, coördineert een nieuw thematisch leerprogramma voor de grotere Niet Gouvernementele Organisaties (NGO's) waarin deze organisaties leren hoe zij mensen met een handicap in hun ontwikkelingsprojecten kunnen betrekken. Het programma wordt aangeboden door Personele Samenwerking Ontwikkelingsorganisaties (PSO) waaraan diverse NGO's meewerken.

 

Bruijn vertelt dat gebrek aan kennis over mensen met een handicap een groot probleem is in ontwikkelingslanden. 'De lokale bevolking is vaak onwetend en NGO's geven in hun projecten nog zeer weinig aandacht aan mensen met een handicap. Tijdens het leerprogramma bleek bijvoorbeeld dat NGO´s soms niet eens wisten dat zij een school  steunden waar kinderen werden geweigerd omdat ze een handicap hebben. Dit stond dan in het reglement van zo'n school. Ook blijkt telkens weer dat hulporganisaties niet weten of ze daadwerkelijk mensen met een handicap bereiken in hun programma's, omdat ze dit niet monitoren en mensen met een handicap vaak een verborgen bestaan leiden.´

Vergeten groep

´Het is een vergeten groep,´ vindt directeur Betteke de Gaay Fortman van Karuna Foundation, een organisatie voor gehandicapte kinderen in ontwikkelingslanden. 'Het is geen hip onderwerp. Een kind met een handicap klinkt bijvoorbeeld minder erg dan kindersterfte. Wij proberen het aantal vermijdbare handicaps onder kinderen te verminderen. In Nepal doen wij dit door de lokale gemeenschap zelf verantwoordelijk te maken voor het verbeteren van de situatie van gehandicapte kinderen. Ik zal je wat laten zien ter illustratie van onze aanpak.'

 

Ze toont een filmpje op haar computerscherm dat begint met Samana, een meisje met een verstandelijke handicap dat geboren werd met een vinger teveel aan haar hand. Hierdoor kon ze niet schrijven. Door het 'Share and Care' microverzekeringsprogramma dat Karuna samen met het Ministerie van Gezondheidszorg van Nepal opzette, werd een operatie betaald door de gemeenschap zelf. Samana kan nu gewoon meedoen op school.

 

In de zorgverzekering van het Share and Care programma is preventie en medische zorg voor gehandicapten inbegrepen. 'Mensen moeten erg wennen aan de bijdrage voor gehandicapten,' vertelt de Gaay Fortman, ´maar de afspraak met Karuna is dat preventie en medische zorg voor gehandicapte kinderen integraal onderdeel uitmaken van de verzekeringspremie. Om duurzaamheid te bereiken moet minstens 50% van de gemeenschap aan Share and Care meedoen. Na vier jaar hopen we dat te bereiken. Wat we willen is dat de zorg voor deze kwetsbare groep vanzelfsprekend onderdeel van dit community based verzekeringssysteem gaat uitmaken.´

Community Based Rehabilitation

Ook Djanak werd door Karuna geholpen met een operatie die de gemeenschap betaalde. Vroeger kon hij niet naar school lopen vanwege gedraaide knieën. Nu loopt hij vrijwel normaal. We zien een social worker die komt kijken hoe het met hem gaat en vraagt of hij regelmatig zijn oefeningen doet.

 

´Dit heet Community Based Rehabilitation (CBR),´ vertelt de Gaay Fortman enthousiast. 'In ieder dorp waar we werken, hebben wij een 'CBR'- werker die de gehandicapte kinderen en ouders bezoekt en ze begeleidt. Het is nodig om ze speciale aandacht te geven, zodat ze gemakkelijker door ontwikkelingsorganisaties kunnen worden meegenomen in de gemeenschapsprojecten. Wij zijn overigens niet de enige organisatie die met CBR werkt. Het Liliane Fonds doet dit bijvoorbeeld ook.'

In de kiem gesmoord

Helaas lijken de genoemde initiatieven om gehandicapten meer te laten participeren in ontwikkelingslanden in de kiem te worden gesmoord door de bezuinigingen. De Gaay Fortman vertelt dat zij haar succesvolle concept graag naar andere landen wil uitbreiden en daarvoor naar fondsen uit het bedrijfsleven en andere nieuwe kanalen zoekt. Het Liliane Fonds zag de overheidssteun halveren van drie miljoen naar anderhalf miljoen euro. ´Het is inderdaad een moeilijke tijd,' zegt Van den Broek. 'We moeten onze activiteiten hierdoor gaan inkrimpen. We hebben daarom besloten te gaan focussen op minder landen. Kinderen die in het programma zitten, proberen we desondanks door te laten lopen. Maar voor nieuwe ´Ziko´s´ is het wachten op betere tijden.´

 

CBR is een strategie die onderdeel is van gemeenschapsontwikkeling. Men richt zich daarbij op rehabilitatie, gelijke kansen en sociale integratie van alle mensen met een handicap. CBR wordt gerealiseerd dankzij de gezamenlijke inspanningen van mensen met een handicap zelf en hun families, samen met dienstverleners op het gebied van gezondheid, onderwijs, beroepsopleiding en sociale ondersteuning in het algemeen. (WHO, UNESCO)


 

 

 

 

 

Sent with Reeder


 

Monday, May 2, 2011

South Africa's white farmers are moving further north

Global development news, comment and analysis | guardian.co.uk

Other countries believe their agricultural expertise can kickstart an agrarian revolution across the African continent

They are calling it the next great trek. Almost two centuries after Boers hitched their wagons to oxen and headed inland to establish the South African republic, they are on the move again. This time they are flying – and their destination is the whole of the African continent.

White South African farmers are now being courted by the north, by countries who believe their agricultural expertise can kickstart an agrarian revolution across the continent. They are being offered millions of hectares of allegedly virgin rainforest and bush, as well as land already farmed by smallholders or used as pastures by herders.

In the biggest deal to date, Congo-Brazzaville has offered South Africa farmers long leases on up to 10m hectares of land, an area that includes abandoned state farms and bush in the remote south-west of the country. The first contracts, which put 88,000 hectares in the hands of 70 farmers, were signed at a ceremony in the country last month.

Meanwhile, in Mozambique, some 800 South African farmers have acquired a million hectares in the southern province of Gaza, thanks to an arrangement set up by sugar farmer Charl Senekal, an associate of the South African president, Jacob Zuma. This deal will be celebrated at a ceremony in Pretoria next month.

There have been sporadic moves north by white South African farmers since the end of apartheid. But the current migration is more organised, says Ruth Hall of the Institute for Poverty, Land and Agrarian Studies at the University of the Western Cape in South Africa. "South Africa is exporting [not just] its farmers, but also its value chains, to the rest of the continent," she told a meeting on international land grabs in Brighton last week.

The mass movement is mostly organised by Agri South Africa, an association that represents 70,000 South Africa farmers. Its president, Johannes Moller, made a pitch for new deals at a conference on large-scale farming in Africa, held in Cairo last April. Since then, Agri SA has received offers of land from 22 African countries, says Hall. Along with free land come tax holidays, free rein to export produce and profits, and promises of new roads and power lines – angering local peasants who have never enjoyed such benefits.

Zambia wants South African pioneers to grow maize, and Sudan is offering land and irrigation water to grow sugar cane. Another deal, currently on hold, would see them take over 35,000 hectares of Libya.

With one-third of South Africa's white-owned farmland to be transferred to black owners by 2014, many white South African landowners are keen to find new territory, though most want to keep their home farms as well, says Hall.

The new trek is attracting support from major South African finance houses such as Standard Bank and investment funds such as Emergent Asset Management, a UK-South Africa fund run by former Goldman Sachs high flyer Susan Payne. She claims to be investing in 14 African countries and promises a 30% annual return.

Many African countries believe the new white farmers can end their reliance on food imports. But the farmers and their financiers often have other plans. According to Theo de Jager, Agri SA deputy president and mastermind of the international deals, the farmers in Congo-Brazzaville want to grow more profitable tropical fruit for export to European supermarkets, rather than grains for locals.

Another concern is what land the farmers are being offered. The governments making overtures towards claim there is ample "empty" land – in which case the threat is that forests and other biodiversity hotspots will be gobbled up.

But much of the land is, in reality, already occupied by farmers and pastoralists. While the Congo-Brazzaville government says the land it is handing over to white South Africans has been empty since the closure of state farms more than 10 years ago, Hall says its former owners have returned and are growing cassava and peanuts. Like the original trek, the new invasion is likely to be met with resistance.


guardian.co.uk © Guardian News & Media Limited 2011 | Use of this content is subject to our Terms & Conditions | More Feeds

Sent with Reeder


Met vriendelijke groet,
Best regards,
Henk J.Th. van Stokkom.
(mailed from my mobile)

Controlled experiments and uncontrollable humans

Aid Watch

Bill reviewed two much-awaited books for the Wall Street Journal last weekend: Poor Economics by Abhijit Banerjee and Esther Duflo, and More Than Good Intentions by Dean Karlan and Jacob Appel.

The Good:

The books' signal achievement is in addressing two disgraceful problems that beset humanitarian aid. The first is that the effectiveness of aid is often not evaluated at all; the second is that even when aid is evaluated, the methods are often dubious, such as before-and-after analysis that doesn't take into account variables that have nothing to do with the aid itself. Humanitarian aid is usually flying blind. These books take the blinders off—de-worming does work, many other efforts do not.

But things are not as simple as they first appear. The authors are brutally honest about how difficult poverty-alleviation is….

In addition to testing out ideas, such field work also has the benefit of letting researchers chat informally with poor people—conversation that can be thoroughly illuminating. What looks like irrationality may just be the failure of outsiders to fully appreciate the problem…

….

"More Than Good Intentions" and "Poor Economics" are marked by their deep appreciation of the precariousness that colors the lives of poor people as they tiptoe along the margin of survival. But I would give an edge to Mr. Banerjee and Ms. Duflo in this area—the sheer detail and warm sympathy on display reflects a true appreciation of the challenges their subjects face. Messrs. Karlan and Appel are at their best in addressing the subtleties of behavior and testing them in the psychology laboratory and in the field. They have produced a remarkably readable and credible analysis of the intertwining of irrationality and poverty.

The Not-so-Good:

Unfortunately, the books also indulge another sort of irrationality: the demand for big, general statements even if you're discussing limited, context-specific matters. The authors criticize over-generalizing and over-promising in the aid business, but they too often do their own exaggerating when it comes to what their methods can deliver. Both books end with overselling, "five key lessons" (Banerjee and Duflo) or "seven ideas that work" (Karlan and Appel), overriding their own previous cautions about sensitivity to context and the limits to each intervention. Other economists criticize overselling as a common fault of those who do these small experiments.

Read the full review (ungated) here.

Sent with Reeder


Met vriendelijke groet,
Best regards,
Henk J.Th. van Stokkom.
(mailed from my mobile)